Are you rushing to procure AI solutions for your financial services firm without considering the legal minefield you’re entering? While competitors scramble to deploy the latest AI tools, smart institutions are discovering that procurement strategy – not just implementation – determines compliance success.
The Procurement Blind Spot That’s Costing Millions
Most financial institutions approach AI procurement like any other technology purchase. This is a critical mistake. Unlike traditional software, AI systems in financial services must navigate an intricate web of regulations including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – the EU’s comprehensive data privacy law that governs how personal information must be handled – Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) – a new EU regulation requiring financial institutions to strengthen their digital resilience against cyber threats – and emerging AI-specific legislation like the EU AI Act.
Recent EU court rulings make clear that algorithmic transparency isn’t optional – it’s mandatory. Your procurement team needs to understand that they’re not just buying software; they’re acquiring systems that must explain their decisions to customers and regulators.
The Hidden Compliance Costs in Your Contract
When procuring AI solutions, your legal team must address several critical areas that traditional software contracts ignore:
Data Protection and Security: AI systems often require extensive data access. Your contracts must specify exactly how personal data will be processed, stored, and protected. Under GDPR, you remain liable for your vendor’s data handling practices – meaning if they mishandle customer data, your institution faces the penalties.
Bias Assessment and Mitigation: Financial AI systems frequently exhibit discriminatory patterns that can unfairly impact loan approvals, insurance pricing, or investment recommendations. Your procurement process must include bias testing requirements and ongoing monitoring obligations. The cost of bias remediation after deployment can exceed the original system cost.
Intellectual Property and Explainability: You need contractual guarantees that AI decisions can be explained to customers and regulators in plain language. Many vendors resist providing this transparency, claiming trade secret protection – but recent court decisions prioritize individual rights over commercial secrecy.
The DORA Connection You’re Missing
The Digital Operational Resilience Act, which became applicable January 17, 2025, fundamentally changes AI procurement requirements. Your AI vendors are now considered critical ICT third-party service providers, subjecting them to enhanced due diligence and ongoing monitoring requirements.
This means your procurement team must evaluate not just the AI system’s functionality, but the vendor’s operational resilience, incident response capabilities, and business continuity planning. Failure to properly assess these factors can result in regulatory sanctions and operational disruptions.
Three Questions Every Procurement Decision Must Answer
Before signing any AI contract, your team must definitively answer:
Can this system explain its decisions in terms that satisfy both customer inquiries and regulatory investigations?
Does our contract allocate liability appropriately for AI-related compliance failures, data breaches, and discriminatory outcomes?
Have we conducted sufficient due diligence on the vendor’s operational resilience and data protection practices?
If you can’t answer these questions confidently, you’re not ready to proceed.
The Strategic Advantage of Getting It Right
Organizations that approach AI procurement with compliance-first thinking aren’t just avoiding risks – they’re gaining competitive advantages. Properly procured AI systems deliver better performance, face fewer regulatory challenges, and build stronger customer trust.
The window for reactive compliance is closing rapidly. With AI Act enforcement approaching and DORA already in effect, the procurement decisions you make today will determine your competitive position tomorrow.
Are you building your AI strategy on solid legal foundations, or are you gambling with your institution’s future? The choice – and the consequences – are entirely yours.
DORA First: Why Financial Institutions Must Prioritize AI Readiness Before 2027
Why Algorithmic Transparency Matters